Election 2008: What’s At Stake?

Reporting from a new generation of journalists. A News21 blog.

Reporting from a new generation of journalists. header image 2

Experts weigh whether water at a controversial dairy site leaked from a spring

August 6th, 2008 by Lauren Williamson · 5 Comments

COWSPRING1

(All photos courtesy of Helping Others Maintain Environmental Standards)

Workers set up two hoses to pump water that leaked into a manure pond under construction at the Tradition Dairy site.

By Lauren Williamson, Medill

Despite a water leak that occurred while workers dug a manure pond in Jo Daviess County last week, plans remain on schedule for a 5,000-cow concentrated animal feeding operation a mile west of Nora, Ill., officials said this week.

“They were working on the uplands water pit and they hit a spring,” Ron Fournier, a spokesman for the Rock Island District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, said yesterday.

Today, he sought to clarify his comments, saying, “It could possibly be a spring, but it could also be the groundwater table.” The Army Corps of Engineers does not have jurisdiction over this part of the Tradition Dairy site. It did, however, grant the dairy a provisional “nationwide permit,” a type of authorization for activity with little anticipated water impact, to construct in a wetland area on another part of the property where corps jurisdiction applies.

If a spring is present, it means the groundwater could easily be contaminated with manure should the pit leak or overflow, said Sam Panno, a senior geochemist with the Illinois State Geological Survey.

Nic Anderson, a business developer with the Illinois Livestock Development Group, said the source of the leak is a broken tile, which is a structure used to drain excess water from fields.

“It is surface water, and it is a broken tile,” Anderson said today. “I was actually on the site down on the ground and looked at the situation.”

Tradition Dairy owner A.J. Bos, of Bakersfield, Calif., plans to redirect the tiles so water never enters the site, Anderson said.

Bos did not return repeated calls for comment.

But not all experts are on the same page. After examining photos of the site, Panno said that while it could be a broken tile, the nature of the leak signified that the area is likely underlined with a spring. Water poured into the pond last week from a point near the base of the colossal trench, which is expected to hold tens of millions of gallons of animal waste when complete.

Plans for the 700-acre dairy, which is scheduled to begin operation by the end of this year, estimate the cows will produce 90 million gallons of waste per year.

“What [a spring] means is that they’ve intersected the underlying aquifer,” Panno said, “which we interpreted to be karst.”

COWSPRING2

An aerial view of the entire Tradition Dairy complex shows the manure pond filling with water along the upper right-hand corner of the construction site.

Karstic areas are characterized by vertical fissures that allow water to flow from the surface into the aquifer, or groundwater, more rapidly than in areas with horizontal fractures.

Opponents of the dairy, who filed a complaint in Jo Daviess County Circuit Court against Bos and the Illinois Department of Agriculture in June, are expressing hopes that the leak – whatever its cause – will give momentum to their case. The plaintiffs, members of the activist group Helping Others Maintain Environmental Standards and other community members, allege the industrial-scale farm has the potential to substantially pollute area groundwater and that the IDOA irresponsibly approved the dairy proposal.

“One of the best indicators of karst areas are naturally occurring springs,” said Matthew Alschuler, a representative of HOMES. “If he hit a spring right where he’s building his manure pond, it kind of makes our case.”

But the IDOA released a final opinion on May 30, based on research conducted by Tradition Dairy project engineer Terry Feldmann, that the bedrock under the site is not karstic.

The presence of karst does not preclude construction of the dairy, though it would require modifications to the waste ponds, according to Warren Goetsch, bureau chief of environmental programs with the IDOA, in a report from a Jan. 31 meeting of the Jo Daviess County Development and Planning Committee. Goetsch was unavailable for comment this week.

cowspring3.jpg

Water flows into a manure pond that, when complete, will hold tens of millions of gallons of animal waste.

State Agriculture Department officials haven’t visited the site since the water leak occurred, said Brad Beaver, program manager for the IDOA’s Livestock Management Facilities Program, which oversees siting criteria for animal operations. He declined to comment on the source of the water and how it will impact construction plans until the Agriculture Department inspects the leak.

“So many variables go into” how it could affect the plans, he said. “A lot would just depend on what we found for sure and where it is in relation to [the manure pond].”

Though the IDOA has not been to the site since the leak, Beaver said IDOA inspectors have visited multiple times in the past and, so far, Bos is following proper construction protocol.

“They need to build what they proposed,” he said. “If there is some sort of change, we need to determine if that change would be allowable.”

Tags: · , , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Pat Brown (Ms) // Aug 7, 2008 at 8:41 am

    I read with interest, the article about the “spring”. I live in Elizabeth, IL and farmed for 20+ years in the area (different farms). There abound in our area. Just look at Highway 20 west of Elizabeth and see the water leaking through the pavement on the hillside. How can this entire area that was “missed” by the glacier not be consistent in ’substance’ such as water, soil, rock etc? I could recite many stories told me by older relatives and also those I know from experiencing. I share all the concerns the local people from around Nora have. I only hope more elected officials will recognize these and take them into consideration. God bless H.O.M.E.S!

  • 2 Kim Francis // Aug 7, 2008 at 9:10 am

    We received a notice of intent to construct in November, 2007, concerning the proposed factory dairy. At the Nora meeting, there was one thing in particular that I recall. Several questions directed to the “expert” Terry Feldman, engineer for Bos, were usually answered with he couldn’t be sure without referring to his notes. After several such responses, I wondered how this “expert” could propose such a mega project and not be confident enough to answer our questions? Perhaps he isn’t such an “expert” after all.

  • 3 Small Farmer // Aug 8, 2008 at 4:11 am

    The developers of this facility do not care about the environment or the health of the people surrounding it. They have ignored the Illinois State Geologist’s input. They have ignored the voice of the entire county of Jo Daviess and their vote of NO to the construction if this facility. Now,even as they dig their manure pit and break into our drinking water aquifer,they seem to be ignoring the obvious issue of ground water contamination. The clear blueish colored water is obviously natural spring water. Run off from rain is brown and muddy. If they hit a drain line,any water in the pit would be draining away,not filling it up. They are called drain tiles, not fill tiles. The people working on this project are lying,cheating and stealing to get this factory farm into an area where it is not safe for construction and is not wanted.
    It shows how hard the State will work against the voice of the people its supposed to be representing….if enough money is offered by an out of state investor.
    HOMES is the only hope to protect the Air, Water and Investments of the people from NW Illinois.
    The State is working for Bos.The County has no authority. Its up to HOMES. Please help HOMES and make a donation for legal fees at STOPTHEMEGADAIRY.ORG

  • 4 Dr.Don // Aug 16, 2008 at 7:12 am

    USGS Bulletins on mineral resources published 50 years ago stated that vertical boreholes were useless in exploring for ores concentrated in vertical fractures in the Galena Formation, the rock underlying this proposed farm. Geophysical tools are available that can map concealed karst. I’ve done it.

  • 5 Concerned Citizen // Aug 19, 2008 at 7:26 pm

    It seems that all evidence points towards bad desicion making. There are many parts of the Midwest that are condusive to this kind of an operation. Warren IL, and the surrounding area are within biologically significant zones that bring thousands of tourists a year to enjoy the scenery. Areas that lie in environmentally sub par areas with dwindling populations and job growth that would welcome a CAFO of this magnitide. So why JoDaviess County? I would like to hear an explanation of why this site was desired with all of the environmental fragility involved and not elsewhere… Anyone?

Leave a Comment